Getting to Peace Using Open Source Data

By Jon Bellish - OEF Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer

In the security sphere, the use of open source data as the basis for analysis (OSINT) is not a new phenomenon. It began in 1941 when the United States government began monitoring the propaganda programs of the Axis powers, and is used to this day by international organizations like NATO, the OSCE, and the IAEA to monitor developments from afar or coordinate among allied governments.

In the past decade or so, the cost of high quality data and analytical tools has fallen dramatically, and the analytical sophistication in academia and the private sector have increased exponentially. This allows civil society to capitalize on what NATO understood 30 years ago: because OSINT does not rely on classified sources and methods, OSINT-derived analysis is much more shareable than analysis produced using classified intelligence.

This is not to say that open source analysts have the jump on intelligence agencies, though the barriers to entry are lower each day. But this qualitative difference—shareability—is nevertheless noteworthy. Beyond facilitating information sharing among allied governments, which has been fairly standard practice since the 1990s, the increased availability of OSINT to civil society organizations provides at least three important and relatively novel opportunities to improve dialogue and reduce risk in our increasingly complex security environment.

Photos courtesy of Google Earth.

Adversarial governments, almost by definition, have histories of mutual spying, disinformation, and misdirection. This creates extremely low levels of trust stymying diplomatic negotiations and leaving the parties stuck in zero- or even negative-sum mindsets. Simply having a shareable version of reality can un-stick the situation. There are numerous historical examples from the Cold War, as well as Nixon’s Shanghai Communique in 1961, showing how political progress can be advanced by the discussion of shared scientific realities. More recently, there is also some reason to believe that a greater sense of shared reality could have helped salvage the INF Treaty between Russia and the United States, which began unraveling due to a series of factual disputes about the parties’ compliance, coupled with a reluctance by both the United States and Russian Federation to share the foundation for their accusations, all in the service of protecting classified sources and methods.

Even within a single government, shareability can be an issue. Protecting classified sources and methods is so central a security issue that it often extends to legislators, diplomats and even Ministers. This leaves such government officials with analysis and conclusions, but rarely a requirement that intelligence agencies actually “show their work.” Most of the time, this is not an issue. However, as we have seen with events ranging from the Bay of Pigs invasion to Sadaam Hussein’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction, there are occasions where intelligence communities showing their work could have markedly improved outcomes.

As OEF Board Member William Ury says, each conflict has three sides: the two parties to the conflict and the Third Side—the community in which the conflict is taking place. The final opportunity for shareability that comes from civil society’s increased use of OSINT is between these Third Siders and the parties to the conflict. By giving Third Siders a more granular sense of what is happening on the ground, they are more able to have detailed, meaningful, and opportune conversations with conflict parties in the interest of conflict de-escalation and risk reduction. If anybody is asking, “who can do what to de-escalate this situation,” it is the Third Siders.

The world is a complex enough place when everyone is operating with the same underlying facts. When those facts are hidden or manipulated, overcoming intractable conflict becomes nearly impossible. Sharing OSINT among adversarial governments, within governments, and between Third Siders and conflict parties gives us a greater chance than ever before to manage complexity and get to peace.

  • ONN Director Laura Rockwood at European Parliament's Korea Delegation Meeting

    On 1 July 2021, Open Nuclear Network (ONN) Director Laura Rockwood participated in a meeting organised by the Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula (DKOR) of the European Parliament. The discussions focused on prospects for denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula and recent relevant developments. Read More
  • peacebuilding requires learning, communication, standards, and transparency

    Key Themes From Evidence-based Practice Digital Workshop

    Findings from the recent global study and report from One Earth Future and the Alliance for Peacebuilding was at the center of a digital workshop event on May 14th that was hosted in partnership with the Better Evidence Project at George Mason University. We breakdown some of the main takeaways and conclusions from the event's discussions. Read More
  • networked coordination an effective approach to peacebuilding

    Using Coordination as a Key to Peacebuilding

    The challenges of peacebuilding involve maximizing the contribution of multiple technical experts in an often quickly changing environment, and one where participants may not always trust all other participants or where they may be concerned about maintaining their individual authority to make decisions. OEF's Conor Seyle shares how a coordinated approach to peacebuilding can be most effective in these conditions. Read More
  • Chadian president Idriss Deby killed

    Risk of Instability on the Rise for Chad and the Sahel Region

    Following the announcement by the Chadian government on April 20 that president Adriss Deby had died after 30 years in power, OEF analyst Matthew Frank breaks down the poltical situation in Chad and discusses what OEF's CoupCast data shows about the risk for further instability in the country and throughout the greater Sahel region. Read More
  • the important of using evidence to make decisions in peacebuilding

    How Do We Get to an Earth Without War?

    OEF's Executive Director and Chief Operating Office, Jon Bellish talks about OEF's commitment to Relentless Empiricism as core to its belief in and support of iterative problem-solving and careful, analytical design. He discusses how OEF relies on evidence to cut through complexities in order to solve concrete problems at the root of armed conflict, and bring new, collaborative forms of governance into being in its place. Read More
  • Stable Seas program leaving One Earth Future

    Farewell to Stable Seas | A Tribute: Five Years of Sustained Impact To Date

    OEF’s Stable Seas program will close at the end of April. In line with our approach to incubation, it will spin off to become an independent foundation, maintaining its focus on maritime security and continuing to work with stakeholders in the maritime sector around the world. Over its five years at One Earth Future, Stable Seas has constantly iterated and grown its impact on issues relating to maritime security, collective approaches to sustainable peace, and evidence-based practice in peacebuilding. Read More