A New Hope or Cause for Concern? Leadership Change and the Prospect for Meaningful Reforms in Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa

On July 9th, Ethiopia and Eritrea signed a settlement to their 20-year border war. The conflict emerged in 1998 and led to the deaths of 80,000 people before a peace agreement was drawn up in 2000. Unfortunately, until recently, Ethiopia had refused to fully ratify the agreement, leading to a seemingly intractable dispute between the two countries. While the resolution to this border dispute is significant in and of itself, this sudden about-face by the Ethiopian government comes on the heels of numerous reforms instituted by the country’s new prime minister. Since coming to office, Abiy Ahmed has lifted state-of-emergency laws, released political prisoners, opened up the sale of state-owned enterprises, and offered a more accommodating stance on public dissent against the government.

But as with any departure from the status quo, these reforms have also drawn opposition from vested interests within society. Most notably, on June 23rd, assailants threw a grenade into a crowded rally held by the prime minister, killing one and injuring many.

This change in Ethiopia’s political leadership (as well as the subsequent policy reforms) sparks numerous questions. How do such leadership changes affect regional relations? Will a leadership change help to foster (or hinder) a peaceful settlement to the country’s ongoing insurgencies among the ethnic Oromo and Somali? What do these policies mean for broader economic and political reforms within the Horn of Africa? To explore these questions as well as others, One Earth Future will host a series of ThinkPeace blogposts on how leadership changes affect domestic and international policies. The One Earth Future Foundation has a vested interest in exploring these topics given our focus on global institutions and leadership change through the REIGN Dataset project as well as our ongoing work throughout the Horn of Africa via our Stable Seas, Shuraako, and Secure Fisheries programs.

The first post in this series will examine how Ethiopia’s recent border settlement compares more broadly with the end of intractable disputes between international rivals, as well as how such a settlement may threaten the political survival of Ethiopia’s young prime minister. The second post will turn inward and explore how the emergence of a new leader will shape the ongoing ethnic disputes within Ethiopia, drawing largely on the burgeoning academic literature on this subject. The third part of this series will explore recent examples of new leaders’ grappling with regional disputes, to offer a broader picture of how leadership change may help end (or promote) disputes. The fourth post will explore the prospect that new leaders may assist in promoting human rights and ending severe state repression. Finally, the series will end with an investigation into how Ethiopia’s improving relations will affect the economic and political dynamics on the Horn of Africa.

Not only will each part of this series offer new insight into the evolving political context on the Horn of Africa, but this series will also identify resources available to the public to monitor global and regional patterns in interstate cooperation and regime durability through One Earth Future’s REIGN Dataset and the Stable Seas program.

  • Chadian president Idriss Deby killed

    Risk of Instability on the Rise for Chad and the Sahel Region

    Following the announcement by the Chadian government on April 20 that president Adriss Deby had died after 30 years in power, OEF analyst Matthew Frank breaks down the poltical situation in Chad and discusses what OEF's CoupCast data shows about the risk for further instability in the country and throughout the greater Sahel region. Read More
  • the important of using evidence to make decisions in peacebuilding

    How Do We Get to an Earth Without War?

    OEF's Executive Director and Chief Operating Office, Jon Bellish talks about OEF's commitment to Relentless Empiricism as core to its belief in and support of iterative problem-solving and careful, analytical design. He discusses how OEF relies on evidence to cut through complexities in order to solve concrete problems at the root of armed conflict, and bring new, collaborative forms of governance into being in its place. Read More
  • New report explores evidence based practice in peacebuilding

    Evidence for Peacebuilding: New Report Released

    OEF and Alliance for Peacebuilding have released a new report analyzing the results of a wide-ranging survey of 207 international peace researchers, peace funders, and peacebuilders about their perspective on the evidence base around the results of international peacebuilding initiatives. Read More
  • Stable Seas program is leaving One Earth Future

    Setting Sail: OEF’s Stable Seas Program Reaches New Milestone

    After three years of programmatic incubation, OEF’s Stable Seas program has reached a new milestone. Because of the team’s success demonstrating how accessible information on the relationships between maritime security and on-shore violence can shape the preparedness of government leaders, on May 1st the program’s work is being taken on by a new independent entity being formed by a consortium of partners anchored by the United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime. Read More
  • The Difficulty of Peacebuilding in Syria

    Peacebuilding Requires a Coordinated Effort

    OEF’s goal is ultimately the elimination of war. In order to achieve this admittedly lofty goal, we need to have a working theory of the causes of war and how we can help to disrupt them. Fortunately, there is a large body of research in “peace science” and, more broadly, political science. In developing our theory, our challenge wasn’t having too little information - it was coming up with a way of analyzing all of the research out there and developing a theory of war useful to our work. Read More
  • Open Nuclear Network - Engagement Network Members

    ONN Announces Engagement Network Members

    Open Nuclear Network (ONN) is excited to introduce the members of its Engagement Network (EN) to a broader audience. During the past year, ONN has worked to establish close working relationships with esteemed former senior officials and experts from China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States, all committed to working together with ONN on the focused mission of nuclear risk reduction on the Korean Peninsula and in the broader Northeast Asia region. Read More