Violence and Votes: Why Organize a Non-Competitive Election in Egypt?

Egypt’s President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi. Photo: DOD photo by U.S. Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith

This is the first post in a five-part, weekly series on elections in dictatorships. Visit our CoupCast site for information about our REIGN database and previous commentary on coups d’état.

Presidential elections in Egypt will take place this week for the first time since 2014. While the race officially has two contenders, the outcome of the election is a certainty. Sitting president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is expected to win despite massive economic inflation and a range of human rights abuses. Mostafa Mousa of the Ghad Party, the only other candidate running in the election, is largely seen as a puppet of the al-Sisi regime.

The conditions are ripe in Egypt for al-Sisi to remain in power. How did Egypt, once the beacon of the Arab Spring, get here?

Al-Sisi came to power in 2013 after orchestrating a coup d’état against elected leader Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Al-Sisi’s tenacity for violent repression was made immediately clear in the following months. Between July and August 2013, the Egyptian police and army opened fire on crowds of demonstrators, with the deadliest incident causing nearly 1,000 deaths in Rab’a al-Adawiya.

Yet, al-Sisi hosted and won the 2014 presidential election in Egypt with 97 percent of the vote. In the four years since, he banned the Muslim Brotherhood and promised that the 2011 Tahrir Square demonstrations would never happen again. Police reportedly raided more than 5,000 homes and arrested hundreds of activists ahead of the anniversary of Tahrir Square in 2016.

He has followed up on these promises with widespread suppression of civil society. In November 2016, the regime passed a widely condemned bill that bans NGOs from activities the government deems to “harm national security” and that places strict restrictions on domestic and international funding for local NGOs.

Several opposition groups put forward candidates to run against al-Sisi. They all backed out, facing intimidation and arrest. As a result, these opposition groups are encouraging voters to boycott the presidential elections.       

If the al-Sisi regime is controlling the outcome of the presidential election, why bother to host an election at all?

Hosting noncompetitive elections in a dictatorship is one strategy to stay in power. This might be a particularly useful strategy if a dictator took power via a coup. Our CoupCast program uses the unique REIGN dataset to forecast the risk of coup in every country, every month. From these historical data, we can glean a better understanding of why coups happen and why elections happen in dictatorships.

Considering that al-Sisi came to power after orchestrating a coup, how long on average does a dictator by coup remain in power?

Our historical data show that the majority of leaders who come to power via a coup experience a tenure up to 16 years following a coup, with the average at 6.1 years and the median at 2.9 years. One leader, Fidel Castro, remained in power for 49.1 years following a coup. Whether or not they host elections may be a key element accounting for this variation.


How frequently do dictators by coup host elections?

Figures and Data Analysis by Clayton Besaw

The first and second figures show us that most dictators by coup (at 52 percent) tend to hold at least one election. The third figure is particularly important. When dictators by coup do not host elections, they stay in power for 3.4 years. When they do host elections, they stay in power for 8.5 years.

Dictators by coup who host at least one election stay in power longer than dictators by coup who do not host elections.

Hosting elections, even noncompetitive elections, appears to be a good strategy for dictators by coup who want to stay in power longer. But, this is still a risky decision as dictators expose themselves to competition and public scrutiny during elections. According to our CoupCast projections, Egypt is the second most likely country to experience a coup this month.

How can hosting elections be both a good strategy for staying in power and a risk for dictators by coup?

The political dynamics in dictatorships are complex. This is particularly true for those who gain power through coups. As a rare event, it is hard to say with certainty that a coup will take place. By drawing on our REIGN data and examining historical cases of coup attempts and elections in dictatorships, we can reveal general lessons.  

This is the first post in a five-part, weekly series examining the role of elections in dictatorships, particularly focused on dictators who take power by coup. In subsequent posts, we’ll discuss the following questions: Are coups more likely before or after elections? Do coup leaders face a higher risk of a coup attempt? Do dictators by coup ever lose elections? If they do, do they step down?

  • Open Nuclear Network - Engagement Network Members

    ONN Announces Engagement Network Members

    Open Nuclear Network (ONN) is excited to introduce the members of its Engagement Network (EN) to a broader audience. During the past year, ONN has worked to establish close working relationships with esteemed former senior officials and experts from China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States, all committed to working together with ONN on the focused mission of nuclear risk reduction on the Korean Peninsula and in the broader Northeast Asia region. Read More
  • Somali investments European Union

    Shuraako partners with the EU to boost the Somali private sector through access to finance

    On February 2, 2021, the European Union launched 3 new projects in support of Somalia’s private sector. One of the projects will contribute 5.5M€ to the Nordic Horn of Africa Opportunities Fund (the ‘Nordic Fund’) which is an impact fund targeting Somali small and medium sized enterprises. This brings the total funds that Shuraako manages (under the Nordic Fund) to $24 million. Read More
  • OEF theory of Peace monument

    A Deep-Dive into OEF's Theory of Peace

    Peacebuilding organizations like OEF face a surprising problem: deciding what we mean by peace. In developing our theories of impact and articulating how we do our work, we start with our end goal: the elimination of war and large-scale organized political violence. Read More
  • black peacebuilders influential

    Recognizing a Few Influential Peacebuilders this Black History Month

    In our mission to create an Earth beyond war and establish sustainable peace, we’re taking a moment to acknowledge a few of the many influential and empowering peacebuilders of the black community who have left an everlasting impact on the path towards a peaceful humanity.  Read More
  • ONN Engagement Network Retreat

    Fostering Inclusive Dialogue Around Nuclear De-escalation

    On January 26, OEF’s Open Nuclear Network program held its inaugural annual Engagement Network (EN) retreat, featuring a keynote address by Lukas Mandl, an Austrian member of the European Parliament and Chair of the EU Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula. Read More
  • Katsu Furukawa Wins the Seiron Award

    Promoting Peace Through Publication: Open Nuclear Network Analyst Recognized with the Japanese Seiron Award

    Through his writing and analysis, Dr. Katsuhisa Furukawa, an analyst on One Earth Future Foundation’s Open Nuclear Network program (ONN) team, has been able to demonstrate publicly that a non-governmental expert can use open source information to detect detect networks related to WMD proliferation. In recognition of his writings as a distinguished option leader in Japan, he has been awarded the Seiron Award.  Read More