Working Locally and Transnationally: Making UN Peacekeeping More Effective

MINUSMA peacekeepers conversing with the local population in the village of Bara in northeastern Mali. Building ties to the local community is crucial for safe peacekeeping missions. Photo: UN Force Patrol.

Militant organizations such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State are now collaborating with each other and with transnational criminal networks. They are working together to smuggle weapons, people, and narcotics across national borders. These highly adaptive organizations are also cultivating religious, ethnic, and community-based relationships with populations through a combination of “soft power” tactics. By doing so, they are gaining legitimacy at the local level.

This convergence of security threats presents significant challenges to conventional peacekeeping approaches and practices, which are often narrow in scope and have a single country mandate. These threats also present security challenges that extend beyond the state and are increasingly taking on regional dimensions, necessitating regional peacekeeping responses.

Source: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/infographics?page=1

For example, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) controls northern Mali only through the implicit support of local Tuareg groups. In contrast, peacekeepers have few ties to the local community. This lack of local knowledge undermines peacekeeping efforts: the UN peacekeeping mission in Mali (MINUSMA) is now considered among the most dangerous UN peacekeeping missions ever undertaken, with over 118 peacekeepers killed since it was established in 2013.

Collaboration and coordination by terrorist organizations such as AQIM with other terrorist organizations including Boko Haram in Nigeria, al-Shabab in Somalia, and AQAP in Yemen are common. So too is deployment of experienced combatants across multiple conflict zones. For instance, AQIM fighters are thought to have joined the al-Qaeda insurgencies in Syria and in Iraq in 2013. Sharing strategies and intelligence and facilitating transnational trafficking networks are integral to raising revenue for terrorist organizations. AQIM is also said to be a key player in the highly lucrative cocaine trade across the Western Sahara—estimated to be worth US$900 million in 2011. Other activities include running protection rackets, kidnapping for ransom, and smuggling people, in addition to receiving further transnational funding from governments such as Sudan and Iran.

One possible means of addressing the increasingly transnational threats faced by UN peacekeeping missions would be to further institutionalize cooperation with regional organizations. Currently cooperation of this nature is often ad hoc, occurring only when crises arise. Collaboration between UN missions and regional organizations regarding intelligence gathering, information sharing, border security, illicit funding for armed groups, and potential refugee flows, for example, needs to be built into the planning stages of peacekeeping missions. In the context of MINUSMA, this could entail closer cooperation with the Economic Community of West African States and the African Union. Practically this could include joint security operations against the various armed groups putting down roots across the Sahel.

Only by taking steps to make missions less state-centric can UN peacekeeping begin to effectively address the transnational challenges they face. 

Check back next week when we will discuss providing accountability for sexual exploitation and assault in peacekeeping. For previous pieces in this series and other analyses on international conflict and governance, check our ThinkPeace blog.

  • Getting to Peace Using Open Source Data

    The world is complex enough when everyone is operating with the same set of underlying facts on any given topic. When those facts are hidden or manipulated, overcoming intractable conflict becomes nearly impossible. Sharing open source data among adversarial governments, within governments, and between “Third Siders” and conflict parties gives us a greater chance than ever before to manage complexity and get to peace. Read More
  • ONN Director Laura Rockwood at European Parliament's Korea Delegation Meeting

    On 1 July 2021, Open Nuclear Network (ONN) Director Laura Rockwood participated in a meeting organised by the Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula (DKOR) of the European Parliament. The discussions focused on prospects for denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula and recent relevant developments. Read More
  • peacebuilding requires learning, communication, standards, and transparency

    Key Themes From Evidence-based Practice Digital Workshop

    Findings from the recent global study and report from One Earth Future and the Alliance for Peacebuilding was at the center of a digital workshop event on May 14th that was hosted in partnership with the Better Evidence Project at George Mason University. We breakdown some of the main takeaways and conclusions from the event's discussions. Read More
  • networked coordination an effective approach to peacebuilding

    Using Coordination as a Key to Peacebuilding

    The challenges of peacebuilding involve maximizing the contribution of multiple technical experts in an often quickly changing environment, and one where participants may not always trust all other participants or where they may be concerned about maintaining their individual authority to make decisions. OEF's Conor Seyle shares how a coordinated approach to peacebuilding can be most effective in these conditions. Read More
  • Chadian president Idriss Deby killed

    Risk of Instability on the Rise for Chad and the Sahel Region

    Following the announcement by the Chadian government on April 20 that president Adriss Deby had died after 30 years in power, OEF analyst Matthew Frank breaks down the poltical situation in Chad and discusses what OEF's CoupCast data shows about the risk for further instability in the country and throughout the greater Sahel region. Read More
  • the important of using evidence to make decisions in peacebuilding

    How Do We Get to an Earth Without War?

    OEF's Executive Director and Chief Operating Office, Jon Bellish talks about OEF's commitment to Relentless Empiricism as core to its belief in and support of iterative problem-solving and careful, analytical design. He discusses how OEF relies on evidence to cut through complexities in order to solve concrete problems at the root of armed conflict, and bring new, collaborative forms of governance into being in its place. Read More